Chavez's bureaucratic latifundium

Authors:
Luis Alberto López Rafaschieri and José Alberto López Rafaschieri
www.morochos.net

To justify attacks on the independent press in Venezuela, Chavista leaders talk about combating "media latifundium", a rhetorical device that seeks to represent the fact that one person controls the mass media.

And beyond the discussion of whether the allegory is etymologically well founded or not, the truth is that it is easy to understand what it means, fulfilling its propaganda goal. However, it would be also interesting to use the same symbolism with another large extension of resources belonging to one person in Venezuela, for example, why not apply it to political power?

In Chavez's country, virtually all public institutions and offices of the Venezuelan State are controlled by one "owner". Even in the armed forces, officers greet by saying the slogan of the PSUV, Chavez's party, as if the institutions that previously belonged to Venezuela had been privatized for the exclusive use of the Chavista monopoly.

So, according to the concept invoked by the enemies of press freedom, the political reality of Venezuela would also be like a latifundium, but bureaucratic. Unfortunately, it seems that it has no opponents in the high chavismo.

Related articles:

- Attacks on the press muddy the Chavez image

- Trade sanctions: Bad for Cuba, good for Colombia?

- Similarities between the coups against Zelaya and Ledezma

Obama's health reform is politically out of touch

Authors:
José Alberto López Rafaschieri and Luis Alberto López Rafaschieri
www.morochos.net

Obama and his team believe that, as a health system accessible to all Americans is a reasonable idea from many points of view, it is essential to pressure the Congress to approve it, ignoring public opinion.

Obama and his people do not realize that the reform proposed for the health system has a rejection of at least two points over those who support it, i.e. a technical tie. And, in such scenario, it is unreasonable to pass this bill on the House Floor, because even if they get to approve it, by pressure on congressmen and political alliances, the reality is that a little more than half of Americans do not support a substantial reform of their health system.

As things stand, not reforming the health system would be a mistake, as almost half of the country wish it, but imposing this desire on the other half, without including their proposals, would be a mistake even worse. In this case, the right thing would be to broaden the debate and develop a health program with the participation of every national sector, in order to reflect the point of view and interests of all U.S citizens.

Related articles:

- On Republican criticism of Obama's tax plan

- "Buy American Plan" weakens the U.S image

- On the Obama's decision to close Gitmo

Criticisms of Chavez's Education Act

Authors:
José Alberto López Rafaschieri and Luis Alberto López Rafaschieri
www.morochos.net

On the education draft law currently debated in the Venezuelan National Assembly, and that was approved on first reading, we have the following criticisms:

1) It does not recognizes the individual facet of personhood: In the twenty-first century, a law that shapes the principles of a country's educational system, should include the training of citizens to develop their individual and collective faculties. However, this does not appear anywhere in the law and it puts all the weight towards the development of man in the social aspect, which is evidenced in the fact that the word "individual" appears only once in the whole document. Realities that give to the law a too collectivist tendency, typical of fascist/communist regimes that disregard the individual initiative.

2) It is Socialist: It says that Venezuelan education has as one of its goals to achieve the social happiness through "a new social production model" -art. 13, Section 9- Making clear reference to socialism. Besides, it talks about the socialization, ownership and preservation of knowledge in the society -art. 30- which may lead to ignoring copyright and intellectual property.

3) It is racist: It refers directly to what the Venezuelan government call education with an African descent and aboriginal vision -art 12- Excluding intentionally the identification with whites, Asians and other lineages. It should refer to all races.

4) It gives authority to commune councils to act as “educational agents”: In other words, according to art. 16, the political operators of the Chavez's regime would have the right and duty to proselytize in schools in favor of the government. This is because, in Chavez's Venezuela, commune councils are subsidiaries of the government party and are not elected by popular vote.

Related articles:

- Education and health care for free in Cuba?

- Questions after 50 years of Castrist revolution in Cuba

- Socialist dictatorship vs. capitalist hegemony

The post-financial crisis: More regulation

Authors:
Luis Alberto López Rafaschieri and José Alberto López Rafaschieri
www.morochos.net

Since the seventeenth century, capitalism has never existed without government, on the contrary, each new capitalist stage has always been accompanied by more and better regulations. The role of public administration has always been fundamental to the development of capitalism, and in no place the fanciful idea of market self-regulation without government has been tested successfully. This is why none of the contemporary economic superpowers is supervised by a weak government.

So when we review the history of capitalism, we can easily grasp the importance of government in terms of actions that have resulted in indisputable improvements, as the implementation of fiscal and monetary policies; labor, contract and banking laws; as well as the rules on public safety funds and cash ratio -legal reserve-

We saw it also in 2008-2009, it is undeniable that the government's intervention reduced the impact of this crisis. For example, the public power was used to enhance the guarantee of savings, protect those affected by bankruptcy or fraud, limit short selling of companies that were on the brink of collapse, approve the financial rescue of banks and automakers, and implement an intense economic stimulus plan.

Hence, another process that will continue its activity on capitalism, after the 2008-2009 financial crisis, is regulation, as there are some things that, at least for now, the market's invisible hand does not do better than the visible hand of government.

Related articles:

- The post-financial crisis: More globalization

- The 2008 U.S. financial crisis: Origin & ideological implications

- The moral of the global financial crisis of 2008-2009

Attacks on the press muddy the Chavez image

Authors:
José Alberto López Rafaschieri and Luis Alberto López Rafaschieri
www.morochos.net

The recent attacks of the Chavez government against the independent press in Venezuela have prompted criticism from nearly all national and international sectors. A reality that shows us the disastrous impact of these actions in the image of the Venezuelan president.

And it could not be otherwise, what public reaction is Chavez hoping for when he jails dissident journalists like Oscar Azocar, when he orders the Attorney General to bring a bill before the National Assembly that would criminalize journalism, when he closes 34 radio stations for political reasons and when his urban guerrilla bands attack Globovision?

Not only Chavez, but any world government which commits the aforementioned attacks against independent media, would immediately project into the public mind an authoritarian, arbitrary and oppressive concept of the regime. Which leads us to conclude that this new wave of press persecution was another serious error of Hugo Chavez.

Related articles:

- How acts of oppression lead to political self-destruction

- Socialist dictatorship vs. capitalist hegemony

- Focus Group: The opposition and Chavez's radicalism in 2009

America's Affordable Health Choices Act

Authors:
José Alberto López Rafaschieri and Luis Alberto López Rafaschieri
www.morochos.net

On July 14, 2009, House Democrats introduced the America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 -H.R.3200- Click here to download the full text -PDF- of the proposed health care reform.

Trade sanctions: Bad for Cuba, good for Colombia?

Authors:
Luis Alberto López Rafaschieri and José Alberto López Rafaschieri
www.morochos.net

Hugo Chavez has always been a harsh critic of the United States' trade sanctions against Cuba. Chavez says that this embargo violates the people's right to self-determination, that a foreign pressure like this is an unforgivable intrusion, that has not changed nothing in many years, and that is an inhuman policy because the bigger loser is the Cuban people.

Ironically, every time Chavez has differences with the government of Colombia, the first thing the current president of Venezuela does is threatening economic sanctions, but if the disagreement persists, Chavez breaks off diplomatic relations and restricts bilateral trade, publicly leaving the promise that if the differences get worse, he would suspend trading altogether, or would take more severe actions against Colombia.

Therefore, for Chavez, economic war tactics are an atrocity when applied against the Cuban dictatorship, but become an act of justice when the Chavista government uses them against the Colombian people.

Related articles:

- Latino leaders and the 2009 Summit of the Americas

- Why Obama do not lift the embargo against Castro's Cuba

- Socialist dictatorship vs. capitalist hegemony